Note: Reviewers must recuse themselves if named as a project lead or sponsor for the specific proposal under review. The measure is scored 1 (poor) – 5 (excellent).
Section 1 – Required
|
Investment Fund Scoring Rubric Criteria
|
Measure
|
|
1-1. All sections of application form are complete.
|
Yes/No
|
|
1-2. Proposal has identifiable outcomes and includes implementation and assessment plan.
|
Yes/No
|
|
1-3. Proposal has potential for rapid and significant impact and/or scale-up and self-funding.
|
Yes/No
|
Section 2 – Preferred
|
Investment Fund Scoring Rubric Criteria
|
Measure
|
|
2-1. Proposal includes demonstrated cost share (time, money).
|
Yes/No
|
|
2-2. Proposal has potential for rapid and significant impact and/or scale-up and self-funding.
|
Yes/No
|
Section 3 – Project Description and Impact
|
Investment Fund Scoring Rubric Criteria
|
Measure
|
|
3-1. Project Is described in sufficient detail, is clear and understandable.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
|
3-2. Short term impacts of project are clearly outlined.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
|
3-3. Longer term impacts of project are clearly outlined.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
Section 4 – Strategic Plan Alignment
|
Investment Fund Scoring Rubric Criteria
|
Measure
|
|
4-1. Project’s relationship to Strategic Plan is clearly explained.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
|
4-2. Project has potential to contribute meaningfully to one or more Strategic Plan goal(s) and/or to a specific measure of success.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
Section 5 – Sustainability
|
Investment Fund Scoring Rubric Criteria
|
Measure
|
|
5-1. Proposal offers clear explanation for how project will become self-sustaining.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
|
5-2. Plans for sustainability are realistic.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
Section 6 – Implementation Plan
|
Investment Fund Scoring Rubric Criteria
|
Measure
|
|
6-1. Proposal includes detailed implementation plan.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
|
6-2. Implementation plan is realistic given the time frame and resources needed.
|
1–5 (or N/A)
|
Section 7 – Consultation
Yes (costs have been verified and proof of verification was provided.)
No (costs have not been verified and/or proof of verification was not provided)
|
Investment Fund Scoring Rubric Criteria
|
Measure
|
|
7-1. If project involves technology, costs have been appropriately verified and proof of verification provided.
|
Yes/No or N/A
|
|
7-2. If project involves facilities, costs have been appropriately verified and proof of verification provided.
|
Yes/No or N/A
|
Section 8 – Budget & Other Resources
- 8-1. Budget spreadsheet is complete
- 8-2. Costs are appropriately itemized and described
Section 9 – Assessment Plan
- 9-1. Goals/outcomes are clear and reasonable.
- 9-2. Specific measures of success are tied to each goal/outcome.
Section 10 – Additional Reviewer Comments
Additional reviewer comments will be left in this section.
