Experiential Learning Grant

The SUNY Brockport Experiential Learning Grant is designed to support faculty and staff in creating innovative, hands-on learning experiences that enhance student engagement and development.

These grants provide up to $3,000 in funding for projects aligned with SUNY Brockport’s commitment to experiential learning through internships, research, community-engaged initiatives, project-based learning, leadership development, and global engagement.

Funded projects must demonstrate intentional design, meaningful student involvement, and alignment with course or program learning outcomes.

Experiential Learning Grant applications will be accepted and reviewed once per semester for the subsequent semester. Fall 2026 Applications are due March 27th at 5pm.

Evaluation Criteria & Weighted Rubric

Applications will be evaluated based on the following Experiential Learning Criteria:

Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Points (Weight)
Structure, Intentionality & Authenticity (20 points) Clear, strong alignment with outcomes; authentic and intentional design. Moderate alignment; somewhat intentional and relevant. Limited alignment; lacks clear intentionality or relevance. Weak or no alignment; lacks authenticity and relevance. Out of 20
Preparation, Orientation & Training (20 points) Thorough preparation and training for all participants (students, faculty, partners). Moderate preparation; minor gaps in training. Minimal preparation with significant gaps. Little or no preparation for participants. Out of 20
Reflection Opportunities (20 points) Comprehensive, inclusive, and well-structured reflection process for all stakeholders. Adequate reflection opportunities with minor gaps in structure or inclusivity. Limited reflection opportunities; minimal inclusion of stakeholders. Reflection opportunities are poorly designed or absent. Out of 20
Monitoring & Continuous Improvement (15 points) Robust feedback mechanisms for monitoring and adaptive improvements. Adequate mechanisms but lacks robustness. Minimal or poorly planned feedback mechanisms. No meaningful mechanisms for monitoring or continuous improvement. Out of 15
Assessment & Evaluation (15 points) Strong assessment plan tied to outcomes; committed to rubrics or alternative plan. Adequate assessment plan; minor gaps in addressing outcomes. Weak or vague assessment plan; limited connection to outcomes. No assessment plan, or outcomes are not measurable or meaningful. Out of 15
Budget and Resource Use (10 points) Clear, justified budget that maximizes impact and avoids unnecessary expenses. Adequate budget with minor concerns about appropriateness or clarity. Budget is vague or somewhat inappropriate for the proposed activity. Budget lacks clarity, is inappropriate, or includes wasteful use of resources. Out of 10

Total Possible Score: 100 points

Frequently Asked Questions